Special Reports

Forensic Science

FBI suspends bullet-matching technique

  • 09 April 2005
  • From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
 

THE FBI has suspended use of a controversial technique for matching bullets from crime scenes to unused ammunition in a suspect's possession, it emerged last week.

The technique in question relies on variations in the levels of trace elements in refined lead to identify the batch to which a bullet belongs. But as New Scientist revealed three years ago (20 April 2002, p 4) there are serious doubts about the technique's validity. The ratios may not be unique, and the batches of lead are so large that it may be impossible to distinguish bullets made months apart.

"The number of bullets from a single batch might be anything up to 35 million"

A year ago, a US National Research Council review endorsed the concept, but said the FBI needed to improve its quality control and the statistics it used to assess the significance of matches. The panel warned that the number of bullets from a single batch might be anything from 12,000 to 35 million. Around 9 billion bullets are made each year in the US.

Last month, a New Jersey appeals court overturned the conviction of Michael Behn for murder and armed robbery, ruling that the lead analysis that helped secure the conviction "was based on erroneous scientific foundations".

The FBI is not abandoning the lead analysis technique. But after receiving the NRC report it has stopped using it in new cases "until it could address the statistical issues raised in the report", FBI special agent Ann Todd told New Scientist.

 
From issue 2494 of New Scientist magazine, 09 April 2005, page 4
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
Password Login
Subscriptions