New implant may 'bring music to the deaf'

  • 14:54 12 June 2007
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Tom Simonite
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
 

A simple change to the design of 'bionic ear' implants dramatically improves the quality of sound they provide, say researchers in the US who have tested a prototype on cats.

Around 100,000 people around the world have been fitted with conventional cochlear implants. These are built into the skull and tune into the signal produced by a wireless external microphone. The implant sits below the skin behind the ear and sends electrical signals to a set of electrodes coiled into the cochlea – the spiral organ in the ear that senses sound.

This process is far from perfect, however. These implants have a limited range of tones because it is difficult to insert the electrode array beyond the outer turns of the cochlea. The outer turns pick up the high frequencies, so people using today's implants are sensitive only to the highest tones.

In addition, the signals must travel through liquid in the cochlea and then through the organ’s bony wall to the nerves outside. "It is like talking to someone through a closed door – the signal gets muffled," says John Middlebrooks of the University of Michigan, US, who developed the new implant with Russell Snyder of the University of California, San Francisco, also US.

Increased range

The new device bypasses the cochlea and instead connects directly to the nerves that carry information to the brain.

Experiments in cats that compared the brain's response to the established designs with its response to the prototype show the new device dramatically improves the range of tones that can be heard.

"Current implant users do very well with speech in a quiet environment but struggle with background noise," Middlebrooks explains, "they also have very poor pitch perception and cannot appreciate music – in an environment like a crowded room, you use pitch to tune into a person's voice."

Experiments on 10 cats involved first recording the response of the brain to a range of tones. The cats were then deafened and the same tones were played with a conventional, and then experimental, implant installed.

Fully implantable?

Conventional implants only allow detection of tones as low as around 7 kHz, but the new implant allowed frequencies as low as 0.6kHz to be detected.

"We saw that the brain could detect a much greater range of frequencies," says Middlebrooks.

The new design also produced a cleaner/more specific response in the brain to a particular frequency, and used much less power to get results. "If we develop this for humans it would have much lower power demands, so it could be much smaller and perhaps fully implanted," says Middlebrooks.

Tests in which animals are fitted with the implants for periods of months are now planned.

"Cochlear implants themselves have provided a revolution," says Brian Lamb, director of the Royal National Institute for the Deaf. "These implants – if successfully transferred to people – could offer further, major benefits."

Journal reference: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology (DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0070-2)

Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 3 comments on 1 page

By Anthony Bonney

Thu Feb 14 16:49:54 GMT 2008

I am a prime candidate for your new technowlogy, let me know when it is available

REPORT | REPLY

Cochlear Implants

By Pam Zilka

Sun Mar 30 19:58:22 BST 2008

My adult son started losing his hearing when he was about 3-4 yrs old. He is now 34 yrs old and wears behind the ear aids, which he cannot hear well with and not at all when his back is turned to someone. When will this new and improved Cochlear aid be available to the public.

REPORT | REPLY

Cochlear Implants

By Blade Augey

Sat May 24 11:14:52 BST 2008

Can i have moore information on this research you are doing.

Cheers

REPORT | REPLY

There are 3 comments on 1 page

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
Password Login
Subscriptions