For the record

  • 03 December 2005
  • From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Tools
digg thisAdd My YahooAdd Google Reader reddit submitNewsvineciteulike submit
 

In the story about IBM's BlueGene/L supercomputer (19 November, p 27), we said the machine "now runs at 280,000 billion floating point operations (teraflops) per second". In fact a teraflops (not a teraflop) is a trillion floating point operations per second, so BlueGene/L runs at 280 teraflops - and not teraflops per second, since the "per second" is taken care of by the "s" in teraflops. Finally, we should have said that no competitor to BlueGene has yet broken the 100 teraflops barrier, not the 100,000 teraflops barrier.

 
From issue 2528 of New Scientist magazine, 03 December 2005, page 25
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
Subscriber Login
Subscriptions