Rice is arguably the world's most important food source and helps feed about half the globe's people. But yields in many areas will drop as the globe warms in future years, a review of studies on rice and climate change suggests.
The poorest parts of the world, including Africa, will probably be hardest hit, the study says. Rice harvests already need to increase by about a third just to keep up with global population growth.
Predicting how a changing climate will affect crop yields is notoriously difficult. Temperature, carbon dioxide concentration and ozone levels all have a big impact on growth. Yet most studies look at just one of these factors, making it difficult to know what the combined effect will be.
It is also hard to know whether results from experiments in greenhouses with artificial climates will hold true in the real world. But when the evidence from some 80 different studies is combined, the outlook is bleak, says Elizabeth Ainsworth of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
In regions where the average daily temperatures are expected to rise above 30ºC, rice yields will start to fall off, and the impact will get worse as the temperature increases.
The drop in yield caused by rising temperatures can be counteracted by the boost to photosynthesis provided by the increased levels of carbon dioxide driving climate change. But when Ainsworth pooled the studies, she found that effect is not strong enough to counteract the stress plants suffer at high temperatures.
Harvests will also be reduced by rising ground-level ozone concentrations. They are caused by nitrogen oxides (NOX) from power stations that catalyse the formation of ozone in warm and sunny conditions. Ainsworth’s review found that ozone concentrations of around 60 parts per billion, which have already being recorded on farms in China and the United States, cause yields to drop by 14%.
Experiments on the effect of ozone using greenhouses containing artificial atmospheres are still crude, so other rice researchers are urging caution in interpreting Ainsworth's results. For example, many experiments use fixed levels of ozone, but outdoors levels fluctuate daily and plants can use the low points to recover from brief periods of high concentrations.
In general, however, critics agree with Ainsworth’s conclusion that new varieties of rice, bred to tolerate high ozone and increased temperatures, are urgently needed.
She points out that tropical regions need these varieties most, as temperatures there are already close to the maximum that traditional types of rice can withstand. And these many of those areas, including parts of Africa, already suffer regular food shortages.
"This won’t affect the planet equally," says Ainsworth. "In places where the demand for food is already too great, things are going to get worse."
Agricultural scientists say it is still too early to say for sure how climate change will affect yields. Very little is known about the combined effect of high ozone levels and increased carbon dioxide, for example, since the two factors are usually studied independently.
"In the real world, it's still pretty hard to know how these factors will stack up," says Daniel Taub of Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas, US.
But he adds that Ainsworth's study, together with her previous field experiments, have all but wiped out early hopes that increased carbon dioxide might be enough to overcome the other factors and boost yields. "Considering that we're likely to see an increase in population, if one doesn't see an increase in yields that's worrisome," Taub told New Scientist.
Climate Change - Learn more in our continually updated special report.
Journal ref: Global Change Biology (DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01594.x)
By Dr Coles
Mon Mar 24 00:46:44 GMT 2008
Over 400 World Wide Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007. See http://tinyurl.com/2dv6nzBy Raven
Mon Mar 24 10:10:20 GMT 2008
Anthropogenic global warming is possibly already bringing about an increasing frquency of heat-stress induced photoinihibition in food crops.By Tim Mccabe
Mon Mar 24 15:43:50 GMT 2008
I have contacted several groups asking for data that shows a direct correlation with the increase in CO2 and human activity. All the data that I have been able to find does not show a correlation. None of the groups have come forth with the raw data that shows it. I here conclusions but when ask to show the data I get nothing. If anyone can direct me to raw data it would be helpful.By William Smith
Fri Mar 28 00:07:14 GMT 2008
The data is published by the OECD but isn't easy to access online. If you google OECD energy balances you'll get a list of publications you can buy containing the original data. But are you seriously suggesting that the IPCC panel pulled an increase in human carbon emissions from 28.7 to 49GtEqCO2-Eq from 1970-2004 from thin air? A summary of the data is available online at the IPCC site - google IPCC if you want to see it. The CO2 emissions data published in the IPCC report is a summary of published data not a conclusion based on the data.
By Stephen
Mon Mar 24 19:32:45 GMT 2008
This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.By Mr Dave
Mon Mar 24 02:52:20 GMT 2008
For those nay-sayers out there that happens to glance across this page, and I suspect that there might be a few please read on for an explanation and practical experiment to help prove the Global warming theory.By Ramon Sanchez
Mon Mar 24 07:12:53 GMT 2008
HiBy Mr Dave
Mon Mar 24 08:04:24 GMT 2008
Is the time frame of "hundreds of years" relevant?By Charles
Mon Mar 24 09:29:54 GMT 2008
It doesn't really matter whether or not we run out of coal if the planet is going to warm up enough to cause the inundation of coastal cities, farmland turning to dust bowls, more intense monsoons in tropical regions, and so on...
By Polemos
Mon Mar 24 08:55:23 GMT 2008
"According to the Energy Watch Group, global coal production can increase for 10-15 years (mainly driven by China), but then production of anthracite and bituminous coal will peak around 2020 at a production rate around 30% higher than at present. Lignite production is predicted to peak somewhere between 2050 and 2060. However, as the quality of coal produced will be declining continuously the world coal energy peak is projected to come around 2025. It is also important to note that "peak coal exports" should come even earlier, as lower-energy-density coals are not worth transporting long distances."By Tony Byron
Mon Mar 24 20:32:40 GMT 2008
Fact: every prediction for peak oil has been wrong. Growing demand has been met with growing supply. I would take any estimate of "peak coal" with a large grain of saltBy Tony Byron
Mon Mar 24 20:15:09 GMT 2008
Hey Mr. Dave, do you write climate-modeling software?All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.