MySpace-style websites perfect for disaster survival

  • 19:00 15 February 2007
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Celeste Biever
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Tools
digg thisAdd My YahooAdd Google Reader reddit submitNewsvineciteulike submit
 

Dialling emergency services when a major disaster strikes is a typical first response. Now US computer scientists are recommending useful follow-up: logging on to a social networking site, such as MySpace, to share information and survival tips.

A bird flu outbreak among humans or a major earthquake will leave emergency call centres quickly overwhelmed, say Ben Shneiderman and Jennifer Preece at the University of Maryland, US. They came up with the idea of creating a web-based emergency alternative, along similar lines to social networking sites MySpace, Wikipedia and YouTube.

Citizens would use PCs or cellphones to access the site and receive vital updates from the authorities while also sharing information with one another.

This kind of "many-to-many" information exchange, which might include sharing photos and video clips, could be at least as valuable as an emergency call centre or a radio or TV-based alert system.

"The web is a very effective way of disseminating information," Shneiderman notes. "There seems to be a remarkable effort from people to provide information and develop relationships in the electronic environment."

Emerging emergencies

Shneiderman has applied for a grant to build a web-based emergency social network for his university campus. The idea is for participants to register beforehand and access the site should disaster strike.

"The current success stories from social networks are so provocative that it is worth giving it a try," says Shneiderman. "We have an opportunity to engage these emerging technologies for social benefit."

A number of web-based emergency systems already exist, like the Department of Homeland Security's Information Network in the US and the Emergency Response Grid in Europe.

Tough sell?

Sheiderman says these existing systems focus primarily on sharing information, support and communication between professionals. "There is a great deal to be done on the side of the resident," he says.

B. J. Fogg at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, US, describes the idea as "super-interesting" but says it could be necessary to employ moderators – or "credibility filters" – to ensure information is pertinent.

Fogg adds that it may be more practical to make use existing social networking sites, such as MySpace or Facebook, rather than requiring people to register with a new site altogether. "To get people to do a new social network is going to be a tough sell," he believes.

Journal reference: Science (vol 315, p 944)

Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 2 comments on 1 page

By Christian

Fri Feb 08 00:00:38 GMT 2008

This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.

REPORT | REPLY

By Timothy

Mon Apr 07 16:29:34 BST 2008

This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.

REPORT | REPLY

There are 2 comments on 1 page

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
Subscriber Login
Subscriptions